Herb Reichert

This = awesome: "I think in words and pictures and the more images and word meanings I have stored in my scull, the more I am able to distinguish if the art I am making is any good."

Other page one things: I think we can appreciate something as "good" without prior experience of similar things.

Another. Don't forget, what we call 'classical' was the pop music of its day. Think about how commonly we see bits of Haydn in kid's music. "Pop music" is an artificial way, and arbitrary term used to separate music from music. I don't favor that.

Page two: Agreed, music indeed induces "wandery" or exultation. I have discussed this with fellow audiophiles, and many tell me they can concentrate solely on the song and sound for an entire song. I am dubious regarding the veracity of such claims! Put me in your category. They don't call it a musical journey for nothing!

Page three: Disagree on this..."the only good reason to spend audiophile money on a stereo is to gift yourself the opportunity of experiencing as much as you can of the art and sound of humans playing handcrafted musical instruments."

I admit to enjoying things like electronic music, John Cage conducting boat horns, etc. What you describe is completely fine, however. I don't mean to undermine your direction!

_

I agree about doing 'everything' in a state of mindfulness, but then I also approve of sometimes slipping away from that. I had a wonderful art professor in college who would watch us while we worked. Sometimes, he'd come up to a piece and artist and say, "Stop thinking!"

There can be a lot of mindfulness in mindlessness, it turns out! One can start working on something without knowing a final intention or artistic destination and then discover where one's own mind takes one without the artist/creator even 'knowing' it. I admit to having finished some things and only then realizing, "Oh, so that's what that was." I think making art can create a sense of insight 'after the fact' for the creator as well as other times creation being an intentional expression of meaning or intent.

_

Anyway, thank you for another great piece. I am still synthesizing my own way of thinking about sound in the context of your past descriptions of what a piece of gear is drawing your intention to, and how that can be intertwined with our own natural propensity to drift in and out of objective attentiveness. I guess you could say I am trying to find the whole where the sound gets in and allows my mind its wandering, where it will go.

Thanks again for another beautifully done, insightful, and thoughtful/thought provoking article - we couldn't ask any more of you.

The Art of listening? :-) .........

I agree completely with every one of your observations. I wish you could have told me these things before I finished I would have written it differently. I really mean that. Especially, the part about mindlessness as a higher form of mindfulness.

I exaggerated the "mindfulness" concept for effect because I wanted to start newcomers on the road to seeing/hearing their music as a whole continuous vibrating event that should not be separated from the the inner and outer vibration of just Being in the world. And of course it is like my favorite Zen poet Yogi said, "I can't think and hit at the same time." Thank you very much for your thoughtful reading.

peace and Mr. MaGoo,
herb

Your articles, in general, are infused with perspicacity, incisiveness, sensibilities and knowledge - qualities that I admire and have no hesitation in apportioning them to deserving exponents such as yourself.

I would like, however, to make some points in relation to this particular article. Firstly, my wife, who is an amateur artist ( painter ) thoroughly enjoyed and related to your opening thoughts, but ...became progressively "disengaged and disorientated" as you entered into our hard-core hobby!

Secondly, I have recordings of the mentioned labels with a prevalence of M.A recordings ( 15 in total ). I have the particular CD by Milcho Leviev and your points are valid and entirely endorsed by me, although tracks 5 and 6 might have been more appropriate examples ( track 10 with prepared piano is my favourite ). And of course you could have used a number of other M.A recordings, such as "With Space in Mind" and " The Old County".

Thirdly, epicentral to your thesis is, as you state, "mindful and critical listening"....Agreed. However, you avoid the phrase "analytical listening". I am aware that this is often used pejoratively to refer to pedantic and obsessive assessments of the playback components but, in my view, " analytical listening" is not a dirty phrase and can, in this case, be synonymous wit mindful \ conscious listening.

Fourthly, all these fine and discreet points that you are rightly advancing will be much facilitated ( if not entirely dependent upon ) a good....a very good...an excellent system to render and expose them to the astute listener. I am fortunate to have such a revealing, transparent Martin Logan CLX ART based system in an acoustically conducive room, which allows me to hear and appreciate every element of the recording - spatial, temporal, rhythmic, melodic and emotional.

Finally, whist your dictum (as an end in itself): "You can't hear what you are not listening for" is persuasive and aphoristic, it is in my view incomplete because it leaves out the required medium, that of a highly resolving playback system.

Be always in good health and enjoy your chosen music in both sound and silence. May I also urge you to continue living out of curiosity and NOT habit. I apologise for any antithetical views expressed. Your article was brilliant.

I listen, always learning. Cheers, Kostas Papazoglou.

He has quite a sense of humor. And I hear he enjoys a nip. Bet he'd be great company down in your Bunker.

... are really wonderful, btw ... and why I keep reading Stereophile and its related sites. Not only yours, but any of the really thoughtful philosophical pieces. More, more, more ...